1) Women’s roles in Byzantine society involved them
being subservient to the men. Their
purpose was to be a wife or concubine and a mother to their children. The reason for these assumptions is that,
despite this document being based upon the family life between males and
females, the females are placed under a lot more restrictions and generally
hold less power than the male. For
example, a son needs permission from his grandfather and father for marriage,
whereas a daughter needs only the permission of her grandfather; the daughter
is not as important because only one person is needed to determine her marriage. Regarding concubines, the woman must remain with
her patron so long as he desires it; the woman cannot act based on her desires,
rather, she has to please the male.
I think it is important to note that these
ideas do not seem to be based on religious texts nor previous events in the
history of the empire. Instead, these
ideas are based on the opinions of Justinian and his lawyers. Under the concubine section, the lawyers or
Justinian use “I think” and “I agree” instead of something along the lines of “based
upon….”
2) As we discussed in class, Justinian’s background
is important because it gives insight as to how Justinian feels towards certain
groups of society. Although we are not
certain how Justinian felt towards the rich and the poor, we know that he was
raised as a peasant and probably feels either resentment for the rich or
disinterest in the poor. Justinian also
came to power through the military, so some of these laws are probably built
with the military on the mind.
Background of the empire is also important
because the chaos in the states of Rome and Byzantine can at least partially be
attributed to the contradictory laws. To
avoid loopholes, the lawyers would have had to research previous events and
create laws based upon these events.
No comments:
Post a Comment